17.3" Led Lcds
17.3 includes the following new features: Docker Containers in Kubernetes CA Service Management now supports Docker container based deployment in Kubernetes. This method of deployment simplifies the install, upgrade, and patching experience for IT Administrators. Search term: '4743-17-3' Compare Products: Select up to 4 products.Please select more than one item to compare. 1 match found for 4743-17-3. The PC will feature a 17.3” display and HP will offer to selection of two panels: a 4Kp60 panel and a FHD panel with a 120 Hz refresh rate. Such a choice makes a lot of sense since some may.
The 17.3' 1920 x 1080 FHD resolution IPS (in-plane switching) display has a 60 Hz refresh rate and is powered by NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti graphics to deliver fast performance and run complex 3D games at high frame rates.
This first edition was written for Lua 5.0. While still largely relevant for later versions, there are some differences.
The fourth edition targets Lua 5.3 and is available at Amazon and other bookstores.
By buying the book, you also help to support the Lua project.
Programming in Lua |
Part II. Tables and ObjectsChapter 17. Weak Tables |
17.3 – Revisiting Tables with Default Values
In Section 13.4.3, we discussed how to implement tables withnon-nil default values.We saw one particular technique and commented that two othertechniques need weak tables so we postponed them.Now it is time to revisit the subject.As we will see, those two techniques for default valuesare actually particular applications of the two generaltechniques that we have seen here:object attributes and memoizing.
In the first solution,we use a weak table to associate to each table its default value:If defaults
had not weak keys,it would anchor all tables with default values into permanent existence.
In the second solution,we use distinct metatables for distinct default values,but we reuse the same metatable whenever we repeat a default value.This is a typical use of memoizing:We use weak values, in this case,to allow the collection of metatables that are notbeing used anymore.
17.3 Laptop
Hp Envy 17.3
Given these two implementations for default values,which is best?As usual, it depends.Both have similar complexity and similar performance.The first implementation needs a few words for eachtable with a default value (an entry in defaults
).The second implementation needs a few dozen words foreach distinct default value(a new table, a new closure, plus an entry in metas
).So, if your application has thousands of tables with afew distinct default values,the second implementation is clearly superior.On the other hand, if few tables share common defaults,then you should use the first one.
Hp 17.3 Touch Screen Laptop
Copyright © 2003–2004 Roberto Ierusalimschy. All rights reserved. |